Dr. Christine Evans’s excellent study clarifies the historical backdrop that frames Simone Weil’s condemnation of the “untruths and half-truths” contained in the Third Republic’s “sacred history,” because, in her opinion, they contributed to the Fall of France in 1940. Innovatively using narrative theory and narrative psychology, Evans presents the manipulative effect of the false version of events. Simone Weil counters this deceit with her impassioned plea in L’Enracinement (The Need for Roots) for an honest historical portrayal, essential to constructing a milieu vital that nourishes what is sacred in every person. Evans’ conclusion presciently evokes the two “starkly different narratives and visions of the future” presently competing in the United States built on 1619 and 1776 as parallels to the debates prior to the fall of France.
— E. Jane Doering, University of Notre Dame
Drawing on historiography, literary theory, and narrative psychology, among other fields, Christine Ann Evans's carefully researched, wide-ranging book serves to locate important threads of Simone Weil's thought within the fabric of French history. Weil was an outlier and rebel, fiercely committed to speaking the truth, no matter the consequences. She was also a true servant of "the needs of the soul," one who cared enough about France and its people to give herself over to its cause -- even if that meant repudiating those triumphalist, "sacred" narratives so readily embraced and enshrined. Evans's fascinating story does well to capture both the rebel and the servant, and also sheds valuable light on the deep politics of both historical memory and national identity.
— Mark Freeman, College of the Holy Cross
Written in a highly engaging and accessible manner, this book shows the riches nested within Simone Weil’s reflections on history. Offering readers a detailed contextualist study, Evans demonstrates the degree to which Weil engaged insightfully with her contemporaries on French history and effectively challenged complacent national narratives. It is a must-read for all Weil scholars.
— Sophie Bourgault, University of Ottawa