Lexington Books / Fortress Academic
Pages: 274
•
Trim: 6¼ x 9
978-1-9787-1083-2 • Hardback • July 2020 • $95.00 • (£73.00)
978-1-9787-1084-9 • eBook • July 2020 • $45.00 • (£35.00)
David Lawrence Coe is assistant professor of theology and philosophy at Concordia University, Nebraska.
Introduction: Kierkegaard’s Relation to Luther
Chapter 1 Presumptuous and Pious Historical-Theological Backdrops
Chapter 2 Kierkegaard’s Forkful Reading of an Abridged Edition of Luther’s Church and House Postils
Chapter 3 Lauding Luther in Kierkegaard’s Private Discourse
Chapter 4 Lancing Luther in Kierkegaard’s Private Discourse
Chapter 5 Lauding Luther in Kierkegaard’s Public Discourse
Chapter 6 Anfechtung/Anfægtelse: Luther’s Sigh of Resolve and Kierkegaard’s Sigh of Resign
Martin Luther’s influence on Søren Kierkegaard is undeniable, yet the specific details of that influence have been underdeveloped in the scholarly literature. Coe (theology and philosophy, Concordia Univ., Nebraska) aims to fill that gap by offering a careful reading of Kierkegaard’s writings on Luther alongside a deep engagement with the Lutheran source texts Kierkegaard drew from and commented on. Coe’s argument is sophisticated, and his scholarship is impeccable. The book is well researched and will likely stand as the most important resource on the Kierkegaard/Luther relationship in the coming decades. The volume is as much about Luther as it is about Kierkegaard. Specifically, Coe compellingly argues that Kierkegaard’s understanding of Luther was marked by limitations that should motivate rethinking Kierkegaard’s charge that Luther failed to incorporate dialectic into his theology in ways that would protect against the abuses of Danish Lutheranism so prominent in the 19th century. According to Coe, a more robust reading of Luther’s texts allows an interpretation of his work that already incorporates the dialectical aspects for which Kierkegaard was looking. Simply put, this book is excellent. Summing Up: Essential. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty.
— CHOICE
Kierkegaard and Luther provides a clear and riveting portrait of the relationship of the great Danish Lutheran to Luther himself. David Lawrence Coe, who clearly has great empathy for both thinkers, looks at both the “lauds” and “lances” Kierkegaard directs at Luther, but shows, through deep historical scholarship, that even the lances often reflect a perspective that is more authentically Lutheran than Kierkegaard himself realized.— C. Stephen Evans, Baylor University and the University of St. Andrews
Many have attempted evaluations of the relationship of Kierkegaard to Luther on the basis of the similarity or contrast of their ideas, but Coe actually examines the texts written by the two. He assesses the ambiguous relationship with Luther that Kierkegaard reveals in his diaries, and he shows how Kierkegaard used Luther’s postil sermons in forming his own expressions of the faith. This study effectively and insightfully opens a new dimension of understanding Luther’s impact on Kierkegaard and of interpreting Kierkegaard’s impact on modern theologians, both Lutheran and those of other traditions.— Robert Kolb, emeritus, Concordia Seminary, Saint Louis
Coe’s marvelous and engagingly written volume fills a yawning gap in Kierkegaard scholarship. For over a century scholars have puzzled over the relationship of Kierkegaard and Luther, for Kierkegaard’s texts express a profound indebtedness to Luther’s principle of sola fide, while his later journal entries frequently blame Luther for the spiritual lassitude of bourgeois Christianity. Coe sheds needed light on Kierkegaard’s ambivalence. While Kierkegaard applauded Luther’s focus on the subjective appropriation of unmerited grace, he critiqued him for not “dialectically” emphasizing the need to actually follow Christ. With rare thoroughness, Coe discovers that Kierkegaard’s understanding of Luther was based on edited versions of Luther’s homilies that underplayed the tensive nature of Luther’s thought. One of the most valuable aspects of this book is the discovery that Luther was much more dialectical than Kierkegaard realized. While not minimizing their differences, Coe convincingly shows that these two theological giants of the Lutheran tradition shared a common appreciation of the interaction of the indicative of grace and the imperative of works in the Christian life. — Lee C. Barrett, Lancaster Theological Seminary