Attachment theory as developed by John Bowlby in the 1970s and 1980s is an influential conceptual umbrella used in developmental psychology but rarely employed in literary analysis and never before in Joyce studies, as have theories of Freud, Jung, and Lacan. Horsnell uses the work of Bowlby and related psychologists to explore Joyce’s portrayal of grief and bereavement as experienced by characters in Dubliners and Ulysses…. [T]he book's perspective on Joyce’s rich characterizations has value. Recommended… Graduate students, researchers, faculty.
— Choice Reviews
This wonderful and unputdownable book unveils a key facet of Joyce’s work that has remained in the shadows for too long. Linda Horsnell’s study draws on Attachment Theory (John Bowlby, Jeremy Holmes et al) to lay bare the inner emotions of loss in all the characters we have grown to love, without ever being able to pierce through their mesmerising opacity, including figures that have been neglected until now, from Master Dignam to Eveline Hill. Horsnell subtly changes our ways of reading what we came to know as too familiar, perhaps blinded by too many adventitious – detached – insights. At last, Stephen, May, Molly and Leopold are brought back to our living, (extra)ordinary earth, deep into the multitudinous networks of emotional and social pressures that fuel the achingly refined mechanism of their grieving minds. This study is as grounded as it is grounding, carefully taking stock of all the previous Freudian, Jungian and Lacanian theorisations, but bringing something that has been lacking for too long: a granular attention to what Joyce is actually telling us about real loss and mourning; about raw emotions, attachments, grief, and love. In Horsnell’s precise words, Joyce ’s work “ does not involve internal fantasy but rather the affective interaction of one person with another”. This is the book that Modernist scholars and students have been waiting for a long time, one that will be introduce them to a new Joyce, the infinitely delicate poet of the mind, close to our daily lives, struggles and sufferings, and one whom, like Woolf, Kafka, Toomer, Hurston, Proust and many other global Modernists, we need to read again.
— Hugues Azérad, Fellow in French and Comparative Literature, Magdalene College, University of Cambridge