An extremely important book not only for military historians but also for those concerned with the role of disease in history.
— Jeremy Black, University of Exeter
Ann M. Becker's new book, Smallpox in Washington's Army: Disease, War, and Society during the Revolutionary War, is a thoroughly researched and comprehensive account of the subject and the disease itself. The medical literature is well explained to enlighten those unfamiliar with it. While smallpox remains controversial, this new book is a valuable contribution to the history of the revolutionary era.
— Philip Ranlet, Hunter College
In this well-researched study, which skillfully incorporates both primary sources and statistical data, scholar Ann Becker turns a sharply focused lens on the pivotal impact of smallpox on military strategy during the American Revolutionary War. Although inoculating his troops was a slow and agonizing decision, General George Washington clearly understood the danger that the devastating disease, with its high rate of contagion and mortality, posed to his war effort, including to American prisoners of war. Becker ably demonstrate that Washington’s inoculation orders against “this most dangerous enemy [smallpox]” served as a key strategical factor in the ultimate American victory. At the same time, she shows how the disease affected both the American and British armies at different junctures and locations in the war effort. Beck offers a finely detailed, yet readable account of an important aspect of the Revolutionary War that has previously received only cursory attention. Smallpox in Washington's Army helps broaden our understanding of this pivotal event in American history.
— Jeanne Abrams, University of Denver
Before the twentieth century soldiers were more likely to die of disease than in battle. As a general background factor, military historians have well understood that disease was capable of weakening armies. What is strikingly original about Ann Becker’s book is an effort to explore the strategic implications of different experiences of disease in opposing armies. Not all diseases, and not all military efforts to control disease, are the same however. In her careful and nuanced study of the American revolution, Dr. Becker shows how varying efforts to control and manage smallpox could tip the balance between the contending forces and affect strategic outcomes. Dr. Becker’s work will force military historians to reassess the role of disease in warfare.
— Ian Roxborough, Stony Brook University
"Smallpox in Washington's Army is readable and accessible, providing a focused and detailed account of the disease's impact on the American Revolution. I am more convinced than ever by the evidence provided here."
— Elizabeth Fenn, University of Colorado-Boulder
Nearly three fourths of American soldiers who died in the War of Independence perished from disease. Smallpox was among the great killers of militiamen and soldiers in the Continental army, a disease so virulent that it threatened America’s ability to wage war. Ann Becker’s Smallpox in Washington's Army tells this story in an engaging and illuminating manner, showing how America’s civil and military leadership succeeded in controlling and largely overcoming the threat. This is a book that should be read by all who wish to understand the Revolutionary War and the American victory that secured independence.
— John Ferling, author of Winning Independence: The Decisive Years of the Revolutionary War, 1778-1781
In Smallpox in Washington's Army: Disease, War and Society during the Revolutionary War, Ann Becker provides an invaluable account of smallpox's multi-faceted role in this key period of American life. Using an impressive array of primary sources, Becker demonstrates just how deeply this terrifying disease shaped the military strategy of all parties to the conflict from its beginning to its end. Filled with interesting details and compelling stories, this study is a welcome contribution both to American medical and military history.
— Nancy Tomes, Stony Brook University
Imagine for a moment that you’re a soldier in the Continental Army or one of the Colonial Militias during the American Revolution. You might think that the worst thing you have to fear is getting shot or wounded in battle. But you’d be wrong. You also have to worry about smallpox, a deadly disease that strikes both officers and enlisted without discrimination. Able to wipe out armies more effectively than any gun, it has been an overlooked aspect of the American Revolution. Author Becker aims to correct that shortcoming in Smallpox in Washington’s Army: Disease, War, and Society During the Revolutionary War, which builds off her earlier published articles on the topic. The chapters in the book are focused on important areas of operation during the American Revolution where smallpox was prevalent. Each chapter can be read individually, making this book excellent for scholars looking for a specific piece of information. Endnotes are placed at the end of every chapter, further enabling the chapters to be considered and used individually, and making it that much easier to search for sources. This book offers a new perspective on the strategy of George Washington and other colonial leaders during the American Revolution. It places smallpox at the center of their discussions, and makes the threat of disease a factor in virtually all military operations. That said, this is not a comprehensive list of every campaign or battle, but rather a closer look at how the smallpox virus shaped the thinking of the Continental Army, as well as the British army, and how those thoughts led to some of the policies enacted during the war.
— Journal of America's Military Past
In this synthetic work developed by Dr. Ann Becker, readers encounter a readable and concise work that chiefly explores social and military history. While the main focus of the text is examining smallpox as a challenge to the army under the command of George Washington, Becker also provides helpful background on the disease’s impact in the greater Atlantic World and the British army prior to the war for American independence.
Each chapter moves swiftly, providing readers with background on the disease and its importance in the particular phase of the war under discussion. Becker takes the tale slightly beyond Yorktown in 1781 as well. Ultimately, the author concludes that smallpox ‘had a significant impact on military strategy’ throughout the course of the war for both British and American forces (225)…
— Historical Journal of Massachusetts
Long recognized as a significant challenge for the Continental Army during the American Revolution, smallpox has been treated by historians largely as a manageable threat. Ann M. Becker’s monograph makes the disease more relevant and significant to the course of the Revolution, most particularly its influence on grand strategy…Becker uses the analysis of the smallpox virus’s effect on the Revolution to consider a wide range of variables. From the increased likelihood of infection within the hastily raised militia-based force laying siege to Boston in 1775 and smallpox’s effect on the American invasion of Quebec that same year, to the high mortality rates among escaped slaves rallying to John Murray, the fourth Earl of Dunmore’s call to arms in Virginia and the various restrictions placed on inoculation by local governments throughout the colonies…the book is not a simple derivative retelling of older accounts. Instead, it views the impact of smallpox (and inoculation) on the conflict strategies of both sides.
…Smallpox in Washington’s Army contains enough innovative analysis to make it a useful addition to the historiography of the subject.
— Journal of American History
Ann Becker’s book delves into an intriguing intersection of medical and military history, focusing on the impact of smallpox and the new technology of inoculation during the Revolutionary War. While medical historians have written about diseases affecting soldiers, Becker’s focus on one solitary disease as paramount in the British defeat at Yorktown and Washington’s military strategy early in the American Revolution is a daring argument…Her meticulous examination of Washington’s efforts to combat smallpox through inoculation provides a perspective on the real risk of death due to a new preventative measure rather than battle wounds. While many medical historians have explored how the Civil War advanced medical knowledge to the general population, Becker’s work stands out for shedding light on a similar transformation during the American Revolution, revealing the history of inoculation for over forty thousand troops and its reverberation into the civilian population, thereby improving public health.
— Journal of Military History