Rowman & Littlefield Publishers / Rowman & Littlefield International
Pages: 214
•
Trim: 6¼ x 9¼
978-1-78660-772-0 • Hardback • December 2018 • $147.00 • (£113.00)
978-1-78660-773-7 • Paperback • December 2018 • $51.00 • (£39.00)
978-1-78660-774-4 • eBook • December 2018 • $48.50 • (£37.00)
Robert C. Scharff is Professor of Philosophy Emeritus at the University of New Hampshire and Executive Director of ITERATA, a non-profit institute for the study of interdisciplinarity in science, industry, and higher education. He is author of How History Matters to Philosophy (2015), Comte After Positivism (2002), and numerous papers on 19th and 20th century positivism, postpositivism, and continental philosophy; co-editor (with Val Dusek) of The Philosophy of Technology (2003, 2014); and former editor of Continental Philosophy Review (1994–2005).
Preface / Acknowledgments / Note on citations / Introduction / 1. Preparing to “Be” Phenomenological / Part I / 2. From Dilthey to Heidegger: Recasting the Erklären-Verstehen Debate / 3. Heidegger’s Destructive Retrieval of Dilthey’s “Standpoint of Life” / Part II / 4. From Dilthey to Husserl / 5. Heidegger’s Diltheyian Retrieval of Husserl’s “Two Sides” / Part III / 6. Continuously “Becoming” Phenomenological / References / Index
Robert Scharff's new book, Heidegger Becoming Phenomenological: Interpreting Husserl through Dilthey, 1916-1925 is a provocative account of Heidegger's early years that no one interested in Heidegger or phenomenology can afford to ignore.
— Journal of the History of Philosophy
As Scharff sees it, Heidegger's way of becoming phenomenological was not Husserl's, who regarded phenomenology as a theoretical-scientific attitude of a transcendental subject expositing its intentional objects, but rather Dilthey's, who situates it in the whole of life that is always already there as an articulated historical context that mutually correlates self and world into a meaningful whole.
— Theodore Kisiel, Distinguished Research Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, Northern Illinois University
No one knows the Heidegger-Dilthey connection better than Robert Scharff, and in this revolutionary new work he pushes the reset button on the origins of Being and Time. Through a meticulous reading of the earliest courses Scharff reveals how Heidegger’s grappling with Dilthey turned him into a phenomenologist of life and eventually of Dasein, in contrast to the transcendental consciousness of Husserl. Written with clarity and verve, this book leaves the “Seinology” of later commentaries in the dust and restores to Heidegger’s work the existential vitality that is its birthright. — Thomas Sheehan, Professor of Religious Studies, Stanford University, USA
The book is detailed, well-researched, and argued in a refreshingly direct style. It is important reading for anyone interested in Heidegger's early work, and should motivate many to give more consideration to Dilthey's influence on Heidegger. ... Heidegger Becoming Phenomenological does make an important contribution to Heidegger scholarship, but that is not its only goal. It also aims to retrieve from Heidegger the idea of doing philosophy that emerges from experience and responds to the concerns of the surrounding lifeworld.— Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
Anyone interested in the history of continental philosophy, the interconnection of Husserl, Heidegger and Dilthey, or the history of phenomenology in general, will find much of worth in Scharff’s text. It would be especially informative for those in the early stages in their acquaintance with these topics, but those with a familiarity will undoubtedly find something worthwhile here too. . . . The divide between analytic and continental philosophy is beginning to become more blurred, with analytic philosophers doing metaphysics, and there is more dialogue than ever between philosophers across the divide (Heidegger and Wittgenstein being a key example), Heidegger Becoming Phenomenological is also a powerful reminder of why this is a good thing, and how much continental and analytic philosophers have to learn from each other.— Phenomenological Reviews