Lexington Books
Pages: 146
Trim: 6¼ x 9½
978-1-66695-521-7 • Hardback • February 2024 • $95.00 • (£73.00)
978-1-66695-522-4 • eBook • March 2024 • $45.00 • (£35.00)
Dilek Bulut Sarıkaya is associate professor of English literature at Cappadocia University.
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments
Introduction
- Critical Plant Studies
Chapter 1: Plant Sensitivity and Environmental Movement in Britain and the United States
- Emergence of the British Environmentalism and the Rise of Botanical Studies
- American Environmental Movement and Plant Consciousness
Chapter 2: Human-Plant Entanglement in the Poetry of Thomas Hardy and Sylvia Plath
- Human-Plant Interaction in the Poetry of Hardy and Plath
Chapter 3: Vegetal Agency in the Plant Poetics of Thomas Hardy and Sylvia Plath
- Plant Agency and Intentionality in the Poetry of Thomas Hardy and Sylvia Plath
Conclusion
References
Index
About the Author
Dilek Bulut Sarıkaya weaves together a vast knowledge from critical plant studies discussing historical roots of plant sensitivity, vegetal memories, biological notion of plants, and consciousness of plant thinking to provide a testimony of the botanical accuracy of the vegetal beings. Human-Plant Entanglement and Vegetal Agency in the Poetry of Thomas Hardy and Sylvia Plath suggests a recognition of plant vitality in the daily lived-in experiences and cultural practices in the real world and argues that human-plant entanglements are not merely constrained within the literary realm. Sarıkaya’s message about botanical awareness is profoundly essential at this time in history as we come to terms with the anthropocentric assumptions of plantiness and global capitalism. This book significantly contributes to environmental humanities in general and plant humanities or phytocriticism in particular.
— Subarna De, Environmental Humanities Scholar
"In her new contribution to ecocriticism, Dilek Bulut Sarikaya engages the poetry of Thomas Hardy as Sylvia Plath, addressing human-plant entanglements and vegetal agency at a time when the boundaries between critical animal and critical plant studies also seem to be rapidly dissolving. As concepts of “animal” and “plant” increasingly converge on the more fundamental concept of “life” in recent work in the field, the book’s engagement of the less frequently investigated genre of poetry at the convergence of its British and American traditions offers a welcome perspective.”
— Sinan Akıllı, Cappadocia University