One of the most well-known—if often neglected mythological traditions—is the collection of King Arthur stories. Although the stories themselves are often set in the world of the high or late Middle Ages, it is generally assumed tat the historical Arthur was a Romanized Celtic Christian king who resisted pagan Saxon invasions of Great Britain. Over time, in popular understanding, Arthur’s narrative was imbued with various mythic elements and the ornaments and aesthetics (as well as the technology) of the High Middle Ages, making the Arthur we know today. However, in his recent work, The Historical Arthur and the Gawain Poet, Andrew Breeze of the University of Navarra attempts to topple this popular view, providing a historically accurate but nonetheless fascinating portrait of Arthur.
— VoegelinView
These well-argued essays address some of the most contentious questions in mediaeval literary history, including the historicity of King Arthur and the authorship of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Problems like these demand a combination of historical, literary, and linguistic abilities rarely found together in this age of specialization. Fortunately Andrew Breeze has those abilities, and is widely read and unfailingly lucid too. Anyone who wants from now on to dissent from the views he expresses here is going to have to be able to show why.
— Peter Field, Bangor University
Based upon his broad scholarship and his command of languages and history, Professor Breeze convincingly affirms the historicity of Arthur and presents a compelling argument identifying Sir John Stanley as the most likely candidate to be the Gawain poet. This book, written with Professor Breeze's characteristic verve and engaging wit, is fundamental reading for anyone interested in the date and place of composition of the four major works attributed to the Gawain poet.
— Prof. Jerome Mandel, Professor Emeritus, Tel Aviv University
The author constructs a satisfying detective story that pinpoints the year when one of the most admired of medieval poems was written. At the same time, the detective homes in on the poet’s identity and motives. This transforms the way in which we can regard the literary scene of the day.
— Christopher Howse, Assistant Editor, The Daily Telegraph
Andrew Breeze is a rare example of an academic who is brave enough to court controversy. Over the last three decades, his scholarly detective work has challenged established assumptions about the authorship of significant medieval literary and historical works. The Historical Arthur and the 'Gawain' Poet is no exception. This exciting new book makes not one but two major claims. The first concerns the identity of the historical British military leader behind the legendary figure of King Arthur. The second reassesses the authorship and date of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. I would encourage everyone interested in Arthurian literature to read the volume and to judge for themselves the evidence and arguments.
— Diane Watt, University of Surrey
A fascinating exercise in historical and literary detective work, with incisive commentary on previous research and frequent penetrating insights. Our thoughts on Arthur of Britain and the Gawain poet will never be quite the same again.
— Rory McTurk, Professor Emeritus of Icelandic Studies, University of Leeds
Andrew Breeze’s latest work is an important contribution to Medieval scholarship in that it prompts interesting discussions, perhaps even arguments. He makes bold claims about the authorship of canonical texts, such as Sir Gawain and the Green Knight and St. Erkenwald, and meticulously reviews the historical evidence. By means of an extensive detailing of historical events, Breeze connects Gawain to the Stanleys of Cheshire, circa 1380s. He establishes the historical Arthur as a North Briton who was both a war hero and dux bellorum, a position of “supreme trust” in the fourteenth century (17). The research argues that Arthur was real, but not Roman and not a king. Our imaginings of King Arthur are due to generations of oral traditions that have sought out their own Avalon. In addition to the historical Arthur, Breeze also analyzes Arthurian texts... Overall, this book is one for discussion. It prompts us to consider the ties between history and literature in an innovative way. Reading The Historical Arthur and the “Gawain” Poet is like being a sidekick to Sherlock Holmes as he investigates a case. We follow Breeze through all the details and circumstantial evidence history can offer.
— Historica Olomucesia: Journal for Central European History