Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
Pages: 230
Trim: 6¼ x 834
978-1-5381-2167-2 • Hardback • December 2018 • $56.00 • (£43.00)
978-1-5381-2168-9 • eBook • December 2018 • $53.00 • (£41.00)
Jürgen Matthäus is director of the Applied Research Division at the Jack, Joseph and Morton Mandel Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.
Maps AbbreviationsEditor’s NotePART I Introduction - Nazi anti-Jewish violence and the view from Geneva
- Lichtheim, Riegner, and the “Jewish question”
- Adjusting to war
- Understanding the “final solution” as a process
- Making sense of mass violence
PART II SELECT DOCUMENTS- German “vacillating policy” (September 1939 – October 1940)
- “Local actions” as a policy pattern (November 1940 – July 1941)
- “Method in this madness” (August 1941 – February 1942)
- “So little hope left” (March - August 1942)
List of DocumentsBibliographyIndex
This latest analysis and collection of Jewish sources, focusing on prescient reports from Geneva, 1939--1942, is truly excellent. Despite decades of reading Holocaust documents, I found the accumulative effect of reading these reports powerful and moving. This volume is a superb addition to an important series.
— Christopher R. Browning
This volume provides invaluable insights and provokes important questions about the way a small group of uniquely positioned Jewish officials conceptualized Nazi anti-Jewish policy and its origins, logic, and trajectory at the time when the Holocaust was unfolding. The documents that form the centerpiece of the book are reports from 1939–1942 by Richard Lichtheim and Gerhart Riegner, the heads of the Geneva offices of two major Jewish organizations. These reports were shaped by a blend of personal experience (which in Lichtheim’s case included witnessing the Armenian genocide during the First World War), political perspectives, a location at a European diplomatic and lobbying hub, and the accompanying privileged yet partial access to factual information. Contrasting Riegner’s more famous claim to have revealed a particular ‘Hitler plan’ with Lichtheim’s earlier descriptions of a ‘vacillating’ German policy, the editor encourages us to reflect upon the way these narratives cohere with, and even informed, the cardinal competing scholarly interpretations of the development of the ‘final solution.’— Donald Bloxham, University of Edinburgh; author of The Final Solution: A Genocide