"Apropos of its topic—protest and its criminalization—this remarkable text deploys the method, or rather, the counter-method of montage to render its critical analysis. This brilliant methodological decision not only reproduces formally what it seeks to capture, but also functions as a form of academic protest that embodies the spirit of its subject. Bohnet’s book implies that the history of protest, like the political events it recollects, is necessarily revealed as montage, and so the analysis of this history would seem to require the same form of revelation. The book is faithful to its subject on multiple counts and enacts a refreshing demonstration of the Dadaist impulse, which Bohnet seizes upon to perform startling new readings of establishment figures from Rousseau and Kant to Agamben and Badiou."
— Tom Sparrow, Slippery Rock University
"What distinguishes Bohnet’s work on protest and its criminalization is the method of montage he derives from Benjamin and Heidegger. It is deliberately partial, fragmentary, and incomplete. It is intentionally bound to the time and place of its composition. But these self-confessed limitations—accidents and anecdotes of protest from the year 2017—also give Bohnet the freedom to range as a provocateur across a dizzying domain of figures, drawn from contemporary French philosophy, classical modern political philosophy, Thoreau, and the contemporary journalism and literature of protest; meditations not quite randomly provoked by the events of 2017, including the Women’s March, Standing Rock, Black Lives Matter, and other moments as heterogeneous as the method or anti-method that Bohnet deploys."
— Tom Jeannot, Gonzaga University