Lexington Books
Pages: 432
Trim: 6¼ x 9
978-1-4985-8592-7 • Hardback • April 2019 • $147.00 • (£113.00)
978-1-4985-8593-4 • eBook • April 2019 • $139.50 • (£108.00)
Olivier Richomme is associate professor of American history at the University of Lyon.
Chapter 1: “One Person, One Vote”: How Minorities Benefitted from the End of Malapportionment
Chapter 2: Gridlock over one (Latino) seat in 1971
Chapter 3: The Battle for the Latino vote and the Burton Plan of 1981
Chapter 4:Race and Redistricting in LA County: Garza v. County of Los Angeles
Chapter 5: Strategic Gridlock of 1991: Republicans Bet on the Judiciary
Chapter 6: The status quo gerrymander of 2001: MALDEF sues the Democrats
Chapter 7: The California Civil Rights Act of 2001: Latinos end at-large districts
Chapter 8: Tenth Time is a Charm: The California Redistricting Commission (CRC)
Chapter 9: Conjoined Polarization in California: how the correlation between race and partisanship changed redistricting
“If you want to understand the tangled connections between law and politics, resistance and reform, and above all, race and partisanship, in the last 50 years of politics in the American states, start here. Appropriate for students and interested lay readers, as well as for scholars of redistricting and the politics of race, this book is a key to understanding how politics has worked in the nation’s largest state in the recent past and how it might work throughout the nation in the future.”
— Morgan Kousser, Caltech
“In Race and Partisanship in California Redistricting Olivier Richomme studies 50 years of redistricting state legislative and U.S. House districts. In great detail and with extensive documentation, he examines the processes employed to revise these districts, the contentious politics involved in doing so, and the resulting districts, which were often alleged to be either racial gerrymanders, partisan gerrymanders, or both. But Richomme does not stop there: he also provides considerable attention to important contemporary developments affecting redistricting in California.”
— Richard L. Engstrom, Duke University