John Stuart Mill on History

Human Nature, Progress, and the Stationary State

Jay M. Eisenberg

Though Mill has been the subject of an imposing volume of scholarship, his philosophy of history has received scant attention. This inquiry considers the role of history in Mill’s break from the Benthamite radicals, his effort to define a methodology for the study of society modelled on the natural sciences, and his speculations about the course and meaning of history. A dominant theme is Mill’s struggle to reconcile his ambition to develop a comprehensive science of society with his convictions that human nature is malleable and that history progresses as a consequence of intellectual achievement and diversity of beliefs. Mill’s compatibilist vision of the individual as driven by deterministic psychological laws and as also capable of freely choosing a life of autonomous “self-culture” was mirrored in his philosophy of history, as Mill retained the materialistic stadial theory of social development proposed during the Scottish Enlightenment, and an idealistic vision of history derived from the Saint-Simonians, Guizot and Comte. Though Mill claimed the primacy of the intellect in advancing material living conditions, he believed that the culmination of instrumental rationalism in his own Age of Commerce was undermining and marginalizing other forms of individual accomplishment—indeed, individuality itself—in the suffocating conformity of mass culture. Mindful of what he considered to be the culturally stationary states of Asia, Mill dreaded the prospect that a commercial culture with no higher ambition than the acquisition of ever-greater wealth would also become inert as the consequence of overbearing social conventions and intellectual stagnation. Like Smith and Ricardo, Mill anticipated the inevitability of the economically stationary state as the consequence of the fall in the rate of profits under free market capitalism, but rather than await its arrival, Mill seized on its possibilities. The stationary state became Mill’s vehicle for advocating an egalitarian supra-subsistence economy in the expectation that cultural priorities would shift to the pursuit of higher moral, intellectual and aesthetic aspirations, and the revitalization of individual autonomy.

Lexington Books

Pages: 246 • Trim: 6 x 9

978-1-4985-6395-6 • Hardback • October 2018 • $95.00 • (£65.00)

978-1-4985-6396-3 • eBook • October 2018 • $90.00 • (£60.00)

Subjects: History / Modern / 19th Century, Philosophy / Political, Philosophy / Individual Philosophers

John Stuart Mill on History

Human Nature, Progress, and the Stationary State

Hardback

eBook

Summary

Though Mill has been the subject of an imposing volume of scholarship, his philosophy of history has received scant attention. This inquiry considers the role of history in Mill’s break from the Benthamite radicals, his effort to define a methodology for the study of society modelled on the natural sciences, and his speculations about the course and meaning of history. A dominant theme is Mill’s struggle to reconcile his ambition to develop a comprehensive science of society with his convictions that human nature is malleable and that history progresses as a consequence of intellectual achievement and diversity of beliefs. Mill’s compatibilist vision of the individual as driven by deterministic psychological laws and as also capable of freely choosing a life of autonomous “self-culture” was mirrored in his philosophy of history, as Mill retained the materialistic stadial theory of social development proposed during the Scottish Enlightenment, and an idealistic vision of history derived from the Saint-Simonians, Guizot and Comte. Though Mill claimed the primacy of the intellect in advancing material living conditions, he believed that the culmination of instrumental rationalism in his own Age of Commerce was undermining and marginalizing other forms of individual accomplishment—indeed, individuality itself—in the suffocating conformity of mass culture. Mindful of what he considered to be the culturally stationary states of Asia, Mill dreaded the prospect that a commercial culture with no higher ambition than the acquisition of ever-greater wealth would also become inert as the consequence of overbearing social conventions and intellectual stagnation. Like Smith and Ricardo, Mill anticipated the inevitability of the economically stationary state as the consequence of the fall in the rate of profits under free market capitalism, but rather than await its arrival, Mill seized on its possibilities. The stationary state became Mill’s vehicle for advocating an egalitarian supra-subsistence economy in the expectation that cultural priorities would shift to the pursuit of higher moral, intellectual and aesthetic aspirations, and the revitalization of individual autonomy.

Details

Lexington Books

Pages: 246 • Trim: 6 x 9

978-1-4985-6395-6 • Hardback • October 2018 • $95.00 • (£65.00)

978-1-4985-6396-3 • eBook • October 2018 • $90.00 • (£60.00)

Subjects: History / Modern / 19th Century, Philosophy / Political, Philosophy / Individual Philosophers

Author

Jay M. Eisenberg is an independent scholar in the history of ideas, with masters and doctorate degrees from Brandeis University and Drew University.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1: The Scottish Enlightenment and the Idea of Philosophical History

Chapter 2: The Utility of History

Chapter 3: Human Nature and History

Chapter 4: Statics, Dynamics, and the Historical Method

Chapter 5: History and Progress

Chapter 6: Stationary States in Practice and Theory

Reviews

To understand John Stuart Mill, philosophers must yield to historians of ideas—for Mill is one of their own. Grounded in current Mill studies and a close reading of the entire range of Mill’s work, Jay Eisenberg identifies Mill’s historical method in the moral sciences and his speculations on the future of progressive civilization as both cause and consequence of his break from Benthamism. The epilogue is a thoughtful reflection on the ways Mill is relevant for our own times.
— Eldon J. Eisenach, University of Tulsa

In his crisply written book, Jay Eisenberg artfully underscores the role of historical understanding in John Stuart Mill’s political theory. Scholarship in recent decades has clarified how Mill’s ideas about freedom, democracy, and individuality must be grasped in the context of Mill’s moral philosophy. Eisenberg shifts the focus to Mill’s philosophy of history. In so doing he sheds new light on the relevance of Mill’s analysis of threats to human progress in the age of mass society and speculations about ‘stationary state’ political economy to current worries over human ‘progress.’
— Bruce Baum, University of British Columbia

Jay Eisenberg's new study on John Stuart Mill weaves together themes from Mill—such as history, human nature, the normativity of utility, freedom, and self-development—that many readers of Mill find inconsistently and unsystematically combined. Anyone interested in nineteenth-century classical utilitarianism in general, as well as in Mill's version of it in particular, should read this very clearly written book.
— David Weinstein, Wake Forest University

John Stuart Mill on History

Human Nature, Progress, and the Stationary State

Jay M. Eisenberg

John Stuart Mill on History

Human Nature, Progress, and the Stationary State

ALSO AVAILABLE