Lexington Books
Pages: 204
•
Trim: 6¼ x 9⅜
978-1-4985-4960-8 • Hardback • August 2018 • $111.00 • (£85.00)
978-1-4985-4962-2 • Paperback • April 2021 • $44.99 • (£35.00)
978-1-4985-4961-5 • eBook • August 2018 • $42.50 • (£35.00)
Kristie Byrum is assistant professor of mass communications at Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania.
Acknowledgments
Preface
Introduction
Chapter 1: The Landscape
Chapter 2: The Marketplace of Ideas
Chapter 3: Communication in Democracy
Chapter 4: The Specter of Government Intervention
Chapter 5: Distorting History: Memory Holes and Other Destructive Forces
Chapter 6: Refuting the Privacy Argument
Chapter 7: The Free Speech Manifesto for the Digital Age: Seven Tenets to Preserve Integrity in Contemporary Democracies
Chapter 8: The Preferred Position of Freedom of Information
Chapter 9: Defining Freedom of Information in the Digital Age
Epilogue
Appendixes
References
About the Author
A thoughtful exploration of the powerful tensions between Europe’s recognition of a Right to be Forgotten and American conceptions of free speech and press, demonstrating how one culture’s protection of privacy may be another culture’s censorship.
— Rodney Smolla, Delaware Law School
This book explores a complicated question—how should our government balance freedom of information with an individual’s right to privacy? If the US were to adopt a right to be forgotten, would erased facts become fake news? Would real fake news become more difficult to discredit? While acknowledging the importance of an individual’s right to privacy, Dr. Byrum explores the history and principles underlying the First Amendment and argues persuasively that the fundamental freedoms and protection from government intervention found in the Bill of Rights remain strong enough to combat search engine manipulation and that the European Right to be Forgotten would damage these freedoms. She advocates for the free flow of information, arguing that the Right to be Forgotten will deprive the marketplace of ideas, creating Orwellian memory holes and threatening the collective cultural and historical memory of specific events, including protests and political actions.
— Neil E. Grayson, Nelson Mullins