Lexington Books
Pages: 214
Trim: 6¼ x 9⅜
978-1-4985-4121-3 • Hardback • December 2016 • $117.00 • (£90.00)
978-1-4985-4123-7 • Paperback • September 2018 • $50.99 • (£39.00)
978-1-4985-4122-0 • eBook • December 2016 • $48.00 • (£37.00)
Carly M. Hilinski-Rosick is assistant professor of criminology and criminal justice at the University of Tampa.
John P. Walsh is associate professor of criminal justice at Grand Valley State University.
Section I: Institutional Corrections
Chapter 1. Introduction: Corrections Today, Carly M. Hilinski-Rosick and John P. Walsh
Chapter 2. Jails, John P. Walsh and Sarah Light
Chapter 3. Prisons, Carly M. Hilinski-Rosick
Chapter 4. Gender Issues in Corrections, Carrie L. Buist and Emily Lenning
Section II: Security Issues
Chapter 5. Classification of Inmates, Mari B. Pierce
Chapter 6. Prison Gangs and Security Threat Groups, Beverly R. Crank and Catherine D. Marcum
Chapter 7. Solitary Confinement: Restrictive Housing, Segregation, and the Isolation of Inmates, Jody Sundt
Section III: Programming
Chapter 8. Psychological Prison Programs, Emily Lasko and Chad Posick
Chapter 9. Substance Abuse Treatment in Prisons and Jails, David Olson
Chapter 10. Correctional Education and Social Reintegration, Daniel R. Lee
Chapter 11. Conclusion: Corrections Tomorrow, John P. Walsh and Carly M. Hilinski-Rosick
Issues in Corrections: Research, Policy, and Future Prospects provides a thorough review of a number of issues often ignored or given little coverage by other texts in the discipline. Hilinski-Rosick and Walsh use current research from a number of disciplines to explore both traditional (jails, prisons, and gender issues in corrections) and nontraditional (prison gangs, solitary confinement, and correctional education) topics through a modern, insightful lens not often found in texts of this nature. Issues in Corrections should be required reading for any course in corrections where instructors want their students to study current corrections issues in more detail than these issues are given in the traditional survey in corrections textbooks.
— David C. May, Mississippi State University