Lexington Books
Pages: 176
Trim: 6 x 9
978-0-7391-8787-6 • Hardback • December 2013 • $108.00 • (£83.00)
978-1-4985-2538-1 • Paperback • October 2015 • $51.99 • (£40.00)
978-0-7391-8788-3 • eBook • December 2013 • $49.00 • (£38.00)
Marshall L. DeRosa is professor of political science at Florida Atlantic University.
Introduction
Chapter I: Defense of Traditional American Principles
Chapter II: Confederate Constitutional Principles
Chapter III: Political Obligation in a Federal Republic
Chapter IV: The Discerning Christian
Chapter V: Lee’s Two-front War
Chapter VI: Lee under Hostile Political Fire
Conclusion
This book deserves a careful read to extract the enduring elements of leadership in a lost cause that should not be lost from our historical understanding.
— On Point: The Journal of Army History
In opposition to the prevailing, ideologically-driven attempt among scholars to depict Robert E. Lee as a contradictory, problematic, or unfathomable military commander and statesman, DeRosa’s The Enduring Relevance of Robert E. Lee allows the thoughtful reader to encounter the authentic genius of Lee the American patriot who sought to perpetuate ‘the General patrimony of the founding generation’ amidst tremendous social and political tensions. DeRosa also corrects a litany of misinterpretations of Lee from a variety of perspectives while affirming the prophetic vision of Lee as political thinker who warned of the creation of a “vast republic” that would be ‘aggressive abroad and despotic at home.’ This book fills a critical lacuna in current scholarship.
— H. Lee Cheek Jr., East Georgia State College
Not long ago Robert E. Lee stood high in the pantheon of American heroes. Franklin D. Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, Dwight D. Eisenhower, and a host of others eloquently testified to Lee’s exemplary character as well as his greatness as a soldier. The ongoing trivialization of American history into nothing more than a morality play about slavery has led the great man to fall from glory. Professor DeRosa persuasively argues that this is a mistake, that Lee remains vital because he symbolizes an alternative idea of American society and government to the present regime. Along the way we learn that Lee, along with his other qualities, was a very wise man with a deep conception of history—unlike most American leaders of his time or ours.
— Clyde N. Wilson, University of South Carolina
After the war, Lee said the Union victory meant the central government would become progressively tyrannical at home and aggressive abroad. Marshall DeRosa’s book explains what Lee meant by this, and why an understanding of his character and career is necessary if Americans are ever to recover the liberty he fought to preserve.
— Donald Livingston, Emory University