Water Capitalism

The Case for Privatizing Oceans, Rivers, Lakes, and Aquifers

Walter E. Block and Peter L. Nelson

Water covers some 75% of the earth’s surface, while land covers 25%, approximately. Yet the former accounts for less than 1% of world GDP, the latter 99% plus. Part of the reason for this imbalance is that there are more people located on land than water. But a more important explanation is that while land is privately owned, water is unowned (with the exception of a few small lakes and ponds), or governmentally owned (rivers, large lakes). This gives rise to the tragedy of the commons: when something is unowned, people have less of an incentive to care for it, preserve it, and protect it, than when they own it. As a result we have oil spills, depletion of fish stocks, threatened extinction of some species (e.g. whales), shark attacks, polluted and dried-up rivers, misallocated water, unsafe boating, piracy, and other indices of economic disarray which, if they had occurred on the land, would have been more easily identified as the result of the tragedy of the commons and/or government ownership and mismanagement. The purpose of this book is to make the case for privatization of all bodies of water, without exception. In the tragic example of the Soviet Union, the 97% of the land owned by the state accounted for 75% of the crops. On the 3% of the land privately owned, 25% of the crops were grown. The obvious mandate requires that we privatize the land, and prosper. The present volume applies this lesson, in detail, to bodies of water.

Lexington Books

Pages: 338 • Trim: 6¼ x 9½

978-1-4985-1880-2 • Hardback • October 2015 • $142.00 • (£109.00)

978-1-4985-1882-6 • Paperback • September 2016 • $41.99 • (£35.00)

978-1-4985-1881-9 • eBook • October 2015 • $39.50 • (£30.00)

Series: Capitalist Thought: Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics

Subjects: Business & Economics / Economics / General, Business & Economics / Economics / Theory, Business & Economics / Environmental Economics, Business & Economics / Free Enterprise & Capitalism

Water Capitalism

The Case for Privatizing Oceans, Rivers, Lakes, and Aquifers

Hardback

Paperback

eBook

Summary

Water covers some 75% of the earth’s surface, while land covers 25%, approximately. Yet the former accounts for less than 1% of world GDP, the latter 99% plus. Part of the reason for this imbalance is that there are more people located on land than water. But a more important explanation is that while land is privately owned, water is unowned (with the exception of a few small lakes and ponds), or governmentally owned (rivers, large lakes). This gives rise to the tragedy of the commons: when something is unowned, people have less of an incentive to care for it, preserve it, and protect it, than when they own it. As a result we have oil spills, depletion of fish stocks, threatened extinction of some species (e.g. whales), shark attacks, polluted and dried-up rivers, misallocated water, unsafe boating, piracy, and other indices of economic disarray which, if they had occurred on the land, would have been more easily identified as the result of the tragedy of the commons and/or government ownership and mismanagement. The purpose of this book is to make the case for privatization of all bodies of water, without exception. In the tragic example of the Soviet Union, the 97% of the land owned by the state accounted for 75% of the crops. On the 3% of the land privately owned, 25% of the crops were grown. The obvious mandate requires that we privatize the land, and prosper. The present volume applies this lesson, in detail, to bodies of water.

Details

Lexington Books

Pages: 338 • Trim: 6¼ x 9½

978-1-4985-1880-2 • Hardback • October 2015 • $142.00 • (£109.00)

978-1-4985-1882-6 • Paperback • September 2016 • $41.99 • (£35.00)

978-1-4985-1881-9 • eBook • October 2015 • $39.50 • (£30.00)

Series: Capitalist Thought: Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics

Subjects: Business & Economics / Economics / General, Business & Economics / Economics / Theory, Business & Economics / Environmental Economics, Business & Economics / Free Enterprise & Capitalism

Author

Walter E. Block is Harold E. Wirth Endowed Chair and professor of economics in the College of Business at Loyola University New Orleans and senior fellow at the Mises Institute.

Peter Lothian Nelson is former president of PLN Engineering and a professional engineer.

Table of Contents

Chapter 1 Privatize the Oceans and All Other Bodies of Water
Chapter 2 Why Privatize Anything?
Chapter 3 Why Privatize Bodies of Water?
Chapter 4 Aquatic Ownership Concepts
Chapter 5 The Process of Privatization Homesteading, Abandonment
Chapter 6 Existing Law Governing the Seas
Chapter 7 Oceans—Concepts of Oceanological Ownership
Chapter 8 Rivers—Concepts of Potamological Ownership
Chapter 9 Lakes—Concepts of Limnological Ownership
Chapter 10 Aquifers—Concepts of Hydrogeological Ownership
Chapter 11 Mainstream Views on Ocean Management
Chapter 12 Piracy
Chapter 13 Case Studies
Chapter 14 Debate—Technological Viewpoints that Inform Homesteading, Technological Units

Reviews

In this pathbreaking tour de force, Professor Walter Block of Loyola University, New Orleans, and Peter Nelson, an engineer out of Colorado specializing in water resources, lay down the case for full-throttle Water Capitalism. In free-flowing, inter-disciplinary form our authors provide a jam-packed foundation (and I do mean jam-packed; the bibliography alone is 35 pages long) for future advocacy of free markets in all things aqua…. In sum, Water Capitalism is a breath of fresh air in the stagnant atmosphere of watered down quasi-defenses of aquacapitalism. Indeed, a beefy appendix is dedicated to smashing the various ‘free market environmentalist’ academic and policy proposals that have preceded Water Capitalism. This section will be of utmost interest to the more scholarly inclined segment of our author’s audience. Nonetheless, an inquisitive reader passionate about a free and prosperous future will find an intellectual adventure well worth setting sail for in this invaluable contribution.
— San Francisco Review of Books