Foreword
Preface: We Aren’t Measuring What Matters Most
Introduction: Investigating the Myths of Measurement and the Meritocracy of Higher Education
Chapter 1: Public Opinion Surveys: From Managing the Herd to Consumer Satisfaction
Chapter 2: The Premise of Student Evaluation Surveys: Measuring Teacher Effectiveness
Chapter 3: Pressured to Please: The Negotiated Compromise of Playing School
Chapter 4: A Question of Validity: Student Surveys Don’t Measure Teaching or Learning
Chapter 5: Predictably Irrational: The Cognitive Miser and the Limits of Consumer Choice
Chapter 6: Are Students Capable of Evaluating Teaching or Learning? An Investigation of
the “Fox Effect”
Chapter 7: Signaling or Human Capital? Credentialism, Degree Inflation, and Socio-Economic Inequality
Chapter 8: The Myth of Meritocracy: The Cautionary Examples of Ancient China and Modern South Korea
Conclusion: Can Schools Become Meritocratic Institutions?
PreviewVolume 1: Can We Measure What Matters Most? Why Educational
Accountability Metrics Lower Student Learning and Demoralize Teachers
References
Index
About the Author