If there’s one single book most localists won’t read but should, it’s this one…. I could not think of anything he left out. If he had done nothing more than collect and organize the theory in this way, Latimer would have done localists a good service. But of course he has done more than that. The real "added value" is his exhaustive investigation of the assumptions and implications of each argument…. We should think harder about how to connect our underdeveloped views about jurisdictional issues with our overdeveloped views about "the issues," and we should be willing to change our minds about one or the other or both. Latimer’s excellent book is a good place to start this work.
— Front Porch Republic
Latimer makes a thorough argument against localism, arguing that local (or more local) sovereignty would provide no remediation to the woes hobbling our society today.
— VoegelinView
[T]his is a good and useful book marshaling arguments against localism and in favor of centralization, including with respect to the value of liberty.
— Tyler Cowen, author, "Stubborn Attachments," and blogger, "Marginal Revolution"
Latimer’s original voice shines though in this thoughtful and bracing interruption of the love of localism—local food, local control, local scale. This refreshing and provocative argument against localism gets to the heart of modern politics and reminds us of the best purposes that politics on a large scale is meant to serve. Both those who love localism and those who think they ought to love it need to consult what Latimer has to say.
— Russell Muirhead, Robert Clements Professor of Democracy and Politics, Dartmouth College, and coauthor of A Lot of People Are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy
In crystalline prose and with considerable wit, Trevor Latimer takes aim at localism in its many guises, urging us not so much to scorn the local as to be far more critical and discerning about it. Scholars, policymakers, and citizens take note: a terrific book on politics and community, governance and scale, deeply researched yet great fun to read!
— Stephen Macedo, Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Politics and the University Center for Human Values, Princeton University, and author of Just Married: Same-Sex Couples, Monogamy, and the Future of Marriage
It takes a village, right? Not so fast, says Trevor Latimer. In this broad-ranging, elegant, and often funny romp through the arguments, he sticks a well-sharpened pin into the inflated myth of localism. Anyone tempted to repeat tired clichés about smalltown virtues should definitely read this first.
— Daniel Treisman, Professor of Political Science, UCLA, and author of The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization
There is a good deal of sentimental nonsense talked and written about the virtues of what Edmund Burke called “the small platoons.” This book dismantles most arguments in favor of localism, while accepting that there is a good case for the devolution of power, but only sometimes. It is a nice combination of meticulous argument and unabashed polemic.
— Alan Ryan, author of On Politics
In this courageous and smart polemic, Trevor Latimer demolishes the assumptions underpinning localism. If, after reading this book, you still believe that local produce is always better, or hold that political decisions should always be made at the lowest level, you will have to come up with better reasons. This is an indispensable book for all those who care about subsidiarity, scale, and place in politics.
— Paulina Ochoa Espejo, Professor of Political Science, Haverford College, author of On Borders and coeditor of The Oxford Handbook of Populism
Localism is one of those hallowed values that people always subscribe to, but without always remembering why. In his new book, Trevor Latimer offers a thoughtful, sometimes bluntly contrarian challenge to such complacency. Agree or disagree, readers will find Small Isn’t Beautiful to be a bracing experience.
— Henry C. Clark, Senior Lecturer and Program Director, Political Economy Project, Dartmouth College
In Small Isn’t Beautiful, Trevor Latimer untangles the complex origins of localism on the left and right and deconstructs the assumptions of its virtue that have become entrenched within U.S. politics. Latimer’s precise, provocative, and engaging arguments are vital reading for scholars of the recent past, community activists, and all of us contending with the promises and dangers of localism.
— Julia Rabig, Associate Professor of History, Dartmouth College, and author of The Fixers: Devolution, Development, and Civil Society in Newark, NJ, 1960-1990
Is power more responsive to people's needs when exercised at the local level? Is centralization a step on the road to tyranny? Trevor Latimer's brilliant new book examines these perennial questions from a myriad of angles and shows that the answers are not as straightforward as many proponents of "localism" think. This original and thought-provoking analysis is sure to provoke fruitful debate.
— Arthur Goldhammer, Center for European Studies, Harvard University, and translator of Capital in the Twenty-First Century and Democracy in America
There is no study that so convincingly shows the snares and sins of localism. With brilliance and wit, Trevor Latimer shows that prioritizing local authority, decisions, and policies repeatedly leads to unjust outcomes, including the practice of basing rights, privileges, and membership on morally indefensible grounds. Progressives, moderates, and conservatives will find, in this timely book, a profoundly deep and usefully complicated understanding of localism. Trevor Latimer’s extraordinary and important book says something original and startling about something as old as America itself—localism.
— Desmond Jagmohan, Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley
[A] key strength of the book is the way in which Latimer takes arguments that are tossed around about what is good about local decision-making and authority and systematically explores their internal logic. He evaluates the extent to which theoretical and empirical literatures undermine the various tenets of these arguments and makes a persuasive case for skepticism. This could be particularly useful for students who are considering the role of scale in shaping political outcomes for the first time, as well as for activists who would like to be armed with arguments against normative localism when advocating for political change.
— Publius: The Journal of Federalism