Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
Pages: 686
Trim: 6⅜ x 9¼
978-0-8108-7248-6 • Hardback • August 2015 • $205.00 • (£158.00)
978-0-8108-7521-0 • eBook • August 2015 • $194.50 • (£150.00)
Artemus Ward is professor of political science at Northern Illinois University. His books include Deciding to Leave: The Politics of Retirement from the United States Supreme Court (2003), Sorcerers’ Apprentices: 100 Years of Law Clerks at the United States Supreme Court (2006), In Chambers: Stories of Law Clerks and Their Justices (2012), and The Puzzle of Unanimity: Consensus on the United States Supreme Court (2013).
Christopher Brough is a PhD student in the Political Science department at Northern Illinois University.
Robert Arnold is an MA student in the Political Science department at Northern Illinois University.
Editor’s Foreword, Jon Woronoff
Preface
Acronyms and Abbreviations
Chronology
Introduction
THE DICTIONARY
Appendixes- Constitution of the United States, 1787
- Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court
- Failed Supreme Court Nominees
- Longest Serving Supreme Court Justices
- Judicial Ideology: Aggregate Voting of Supreme Court Justices in Civil Liberties Cases, 1946-2004
Bibliography
About the Authors
Part of the ‘Historical Dictionary’ series on US politics, this latest foray is the first to address the judicial branch of the federal government, focusing on the Supreme Court as a political institution. Ward, assisted by two graduate students, is very knowledgeable on the subject, having written several books on the Court. At more than 600 pages, this hefty volume provides a comprehensive source of information on all matters pertaining to the Court and, thus, makes for an excellent quick reference. Noteworthy are its extensive chronology, 35-page introduction qua historical essay (well worth reading), and five appendixes. . . .The current work should find a place alongside similar works not only in collections of academic and law libraries, but those supporting political science programs. Public libraries should also consider purchasing. Summing Up: Recommended. All readership levels.
— Choice Reviews
This is a good factual reference book. . . .Students struggling to find their way through 226 years of Supreme Court jurisprudence will welcome it.
— Reference Reviews
“An excellent treatment of… a vast topic…. It deserves to be a research tool for all involved in academics and teaching to judges and attorneys…. [The] opening introduction is most helpful and captures the dynamics of the personalities and social aspects of the Court’s growth and its justices. The extensive cross-referencing also provides the reader with a much easier way to follow up on [the] many citations.”
— Hon. George T. Anagnost, Municipal Court Judge, Peoria, Arizona