University Press of America
Pages: 180
•
Trim: 6 x 9
978-0-7618-6723-4 • Paperback • March 2016 • $37.99 • (£30.00)
978-0-7618-6724-1 • eBook • March 2016 • $36.00 • (£30.00)
Michael Gendre has taught philosophy and ethics in colleges in and near Boston, as well as abroad. He sees Kant and Aristotle as compatible theorists for an ethics of responsibility.
Nicolás Sánchez is past Chairman of the Economics Department at Holy Cross College in Worcester, MA. His expertise is in the field of property rights and institutional analysis.
Dedication
Acknowledgments
Preface,by Michael Gendre
1 Introduction: Empowering People Through Institutional Change
2 Manipulating People by Means of “Bread and Circuses;” Then and Now
3 The Philosophical Case for Limiting Government
4 Caring for Others Requires a Principle of Duty
5 Drawing the Line Between Self-Actualization and Our Duty to Others
6 Private Property Expands Our Opportunities
7 Imposing Restrictions on Inheritance
8 Using Property Rights to Better Understand Abortion and Adoption
9 The Market Is the Best Engine for Conflict Resolution
10 Discrimination As a Moral and Strategic Challenge
11 The Rise of Property Rights in Historical Context: Their Use and Misuse
12 Bringing Back Legitimacy to Government
13 Proposed Legal and Constitutional Changes
14 The Obstacles That We Still Face
15 The Road to Wealth Creation in a Society With Meaningful Lives
16 Imperialism as a Threat to American Governance
17 From Ancients to Moderns: Balancing Individual Rights and Duties to Others
Afterword and Summary in the Form of an Open Letter,by Nicolás Sánchez
Appendix A: Our Assumptions
Appendix B: Our Understanding of Scholarship
Appendix C: The Kantian Texts and Their Contexts
About the Authors
Bibliography
Index
Gendre and Sánchez challenge American citizens to rise up to better versions of themselves, individually and collectively, by questioning the pursuit of mere happiness and pleasure and striving instead for self-actualization built upon Kantian ethical principles. Rejecting the tired dichotomies and slogans of Left and Right, Republican and Democrat, and Us against Them, Gendre and Sánchez challenge readers to reconsider their assumptions, political and economic loyalties, and self-awareness in the light of historical lessons and moral principles. If you are looking for a book that you will agree with across the board, you should pass by on the other side. If, instead, you seek to be challenged and stretched in your thinking about economics, politics, and the purposes and limits of government, this book is for you.
— Charles Anderton, co-author of Principles of Conflict Economics: A Primer for Social Scientists
The authors explain how President Kennedy’s simple injunction ‘Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country’ has been turned on its head—by both major political parties. Worse yet, an inverted and perverted injunction has become the ethical norm in our public school system, especially for the most talented children in it. In a short, readable book, the authors spell out the ethical values that they believe will help a new generation of Americans create a more gratifying sense of purpose for themselves and their educational institutions. This compelling book could be the basis for the teaching of Philosophy to an increasingly content-empty high school curriculum, elevating the kind of thinking needed to preserve and build up from what is left of our civic culture.
— Sandra Stotsky, professor emerita, University of Arkansas
Oftentimes philosophers operate with little knowledge of economics and economists ignore ethical arguments. Gendre and Sanchez are to be commended for their efforts to overcome that bifurcation. Their use of Immanuel Kant as a moral framework for understanding and critiquing modern American society leads to a wide range of interesting insights and provocative policy recommendations.
— P.J. Hill, Emeritus Professor of Economics, Wheaton College