Rowman & Littlefield Publishers
Pages: 384
Trim: 6½ x 9⅜
978-0-7425-0796-8 • Hardback • June 2001 • $186.00 • (£144.00)
978-0-7425-0797-5 • Paperback • June 2001 • $67.00 • (£52.00)
Martin Beck Matustik is professor of philosophy and director of the English and Philosophy Ph.D. Program at Purdue University. He is the author of Postnational Identity: Critical Theory and Existential Philosophy in Habermas, Kierkegaard, and Havel, Specters of Liberation: Great Refusals in the New World Order, and co-editor of Kierkegaard in Post/Modernity.
Chapter 1 Introduction
Part 2 SITUATIONS
Chapter 3 From Liberation to Restoration (1945-1959)
Chapter 4 From Incubation to Revolt (1960-1969)
Chapter 5 From Revision to Hope and Back Again (1970-2000)
Part 6 PROFILES AND INTERVENTIONS
Chapter 7 The Phantoms of 1968
Chapter 8 The Ghosts of 1945
Chapter 9 After 1989—In the Shadows of 1945 and Under the Specters of 1968
Part 10 IMPACT AND DISCONTENTS
Chapter 11 Architectonic and Authorship
Chapter 12 The Habermas Effect
Chapter 13 At the Crossroads of a New Critical Theory
Matu?tík's remarkable new study of Jurgen Habermas provides a three-dimensional portrait of a finely etched figure set against the uneven ground of Germany's postwar struggle to transform itself into a robust democracy. A compelling presentation of the drama of critical intellect at its most incisive.
— Martin Jay, Professor Emeritus of History, University of California, Berkeley, author of The Dialectical Imagination
Martin Matu?tík's book is not only an insightful and rigorous introduction to the systematic aspects of Habermas's work but also an extremely valuable reconstruction of the intellectual trajectory of the author under scrutiny, and a thorough presentation of the cultural background from which his theoretical project emerged.
— Ernesto Laclau, University of Essex
Exceptional book! Matu?tík's work offers a new model of writing a biography of an engaged philosopher and the first integral narrative of Habermas's political life. Under the shadow of May 1945, Habermas, member of the great skeptical generation, could not lead the generation of May 1968, because he judged it as if it were an expression of left fascism. Similarly, after the events of November 1989 he remained blind to many negative aspects of the American imperial hegemony. Yet without doubt, Habermas is a unique witness of Germany's 20th century, a philosopher whose most significant production is not exhausted by his splendid writings, but rather finds its full embodiment in his political life as honest search for truth.
— Enrique Dussel, Universidad Autónoma Metroplitana-Iz (Mexico City)
Martin Matu?tík has written a fair summation and incisive critique of the work of Jürgen Habermas. He brings an original interpretation of earlier thinkers of critical theory such as Adorno and Benjamin and thinkers associated with postmodernism such Foucault and Derrida to deepen our understanding of both the significance and limitations of Habermas's work. The book is clearly written and will make an important addition to the Habermas scholarship.
— Drucilla Cornell, Rutgers University, author of Today’s Struggles, Tomorrow’s Revolutions
In Matu?tík's book Habermas's thought distinctively meets his life (within the vast relevant scholarship). The thought is thoroughly treated.
— Perspectives on Political Science
An innovative and provocative work that raises new questions and offers intellectual insights.
— Stephen Eric Bronner, Rutgers University
Offers a very detailed account of the evolution of Habermas's political ideas and an exhaustive study of his quest to relate his theorizing to changing political issues. The book includes a very extensive list of Habermas's writings and a full bibliography of sources. Recommended for graduate and research collections.
— Choice Reviews
Matustik approaches his subject with an appealing combination of enormous respect and shrewd scepticism. This portrait effectively captures the formative episodes of a figure who has persistently sought to define the boundaries of responsible opposition.
— New Left Review