Lexington Books
Pages: 220
Trim: 6½ x 9½
978-0-7391-9029-6 • Hardback • December 2014 • $120.00 • (£92.00)
978-0-7391-9030-2 • eBook • December 2014 • $114.00 • (£88.00)
Subjects: History / United States / 20th Century,
Art / Film & Video,
History / United States / State & Local / South (AL, AR, FL, GA, KY, LA, MS, NC, SC, TN, VA, WV),
Political Science / Censorship,
Social Science / Discrimination & Race Relations
Melissa Ooten is associate director of the WILL program and lecturer at the University of Richmond.
Chapter I: Movie Censorship and Virginia: An Introduction
Chapter II: The Project of Censorship: Debating the Movies in 1920s Virginia
Chapter III: Censorship in Black and White: The Struggle to Maintain Racial Hierarchies at the Movies, 1920s-1930s
Chapter IV: The Cultural Politics of Race and the Cold War
Chapter V: The Search for Sexual Deviance: Regulating and Contesting Depictions of Female Sexuality On-Screen
Chapter VI: Conclusion: Island in the Sun and the Demise of the Censorship Board
Postscript: Regulating Film in the Age of the Internet
The growing scholarship of film censorship in America, and particularly, in the Jim Crow South sheds important light on the complex relationship between governance and popular culture. Melissa Ooten’s thorough study, Race, Gender, and Film Censorship in Virginia, 1922– 1965, is a welcome addition. . . .She convincingly argues that issues regarding not only race but also gender, sexuality, and class informed Virginia’s movie censorship. . . .Ooten’s examination of how discourses of race and gender informed Virginia’s censorship board is a vital contribution to understanding cinema and its exhibition in the Jim Crow South.
— Virginia Magazine of History and Biography
Ooten's Race, Gender, and Film Censorship in Virginia sheds light on the importance and relevance of film in shaping a hierarchical, racialized, and gendered society. It offers an interesting vantage point from which to view white supremacy and southern history.
— The Journal of African American History
Melissa Ooten not only illuminates the tangled intersections of race, gender, sexuality, and class in Virginia’s movie censorship program, but also deftly explores the public discourse and debates regarding state, local, and individual power over access to cultural texts. This study adds an important layer to our understanding of film as a tool to both extend and challenge hegemonic power within the context of Jim Crow Virginia. With its focus on state and local contexts, Race, Gender, and Film Censorship in Virginia is a significant addition to the literature on race and film and would be an excellent text for courses on film or American Studies.
— Sarah Trembanis, Immaculata University
Ooten artfully tells the story of civil rights through the lens of film censorship in Virginia. The greatest strength of this fine book lies in the way Ooten recovers the voices of Virginians—farmers, ministers, politicians, and mothers—as they debated film censorship, the meaning of race and sex in film—and ultimately, wrestled with their own approach to modernity.
Her thorough archival research reveals in rich detail how Virginia’s film censors used their powers to maintain racial hierarchies through regulating images of African Americans on screen—and how those censors struggled against African American film makers and activists who campaigned against white supremacy.
— Laura Browder, University of Richmond
Ooten’s book takes an illuminating and fascinating look at Virginia’s engagement with film censorship from the 1920s to the mid-1960s. With significant breadth and depth, Ooten considers how film censorship emerged out of a desire to protect “vulnerable” populations – children, white women, and black men and women – from the “dangers” of the allegedly immoral culture of Hollywood. Virginia was one of the states that elected to have a state censorship board to preview and approve all of the films shown in the state. Ooten demonstrates the desire of the censorship board – with the blessing of those who could vote – to uphold racial purity by “protecting” white women, and to reduce or eliminate black progress by forbidding or cutting films that portrayed blacks as anything other than a permanently (and happily) inferior race.
The book tracks the changes in depictions of blacks and in actual race relations from the 1920s to the mid-1960s, as well as changes in representations of women and women’s sexuality in film over the same period. Ooten successfully demonstrates that the effect of censorship was to shore up white middle-class hegemony.
— Lisa M. Anderson, Arizona State University