Lexington Books
Pages: 284
Trim: 6⅜ x 9½
978-0-7391-3810-6 • Hardback • December 2010 • $133.00 • (£102.00)
978-0-7391-3812-0 • eBook • December 2010 • $126.00 • (£97.00)
Subjects: Political Science / Public Policy / Social Policy,
Political Science / Public Affairs & Administration,
Social Science / Discrimination & Race Relations,
Political Science / Public Policy / City Planning & Urban Development,
Political Science / Civics & Citizenship,
Political Science / Civil Rights,
Political Science / Political Process / General,
Political Science / Public Policy / Cultural Policy,
Political Science / American Government / Local,
Social Science / Ethnic Studies / General,
Social Science / Violence in Society
Lindsey Lupo is assistant professor at Point Loma Nazarene University in San Diego, CA.
1 Acknowledgements
2 Chapter 1. Introduction
3 Chapter 2. Literature Review
4 Chapter 3. Research Design
5 Chapter 4. The 1919 Chicago Riot and the Chicago Commission
6 Chapter 5. The 1935 Harlem Riot and the Harlem Commission
7 Chapter 6. The 1965 Los Angeles Riot and the McCone Commission
8 Chapter 7. The 1967 USA Riots and the Kerner Commission
9 Chapter 8. The 1992 Los Angeles Riot and the Assembly Special Committee, Senate Special Task Force, Presidential Task Force, and the Webster-Williams Commission
10 Chapter 9. The Changing Nature of Riot Commission Politics in the Post-Kerner Commission Years
11 Chapter 10. Conclusion
12 Archive Notes
13 Bibliography
Lindsey Lupo's outlook is fresh and her writing provocative. This book takes on established ideas about mass rioting and poses disturbing questions about how we view race and violence in America. Not everyone reading this book will agree with its theme, but they will learn a great deal and be roused by its message.
— Hank V. Savitch, Brown and Williamson Distinguished Research Professor, University of Louisville
Riot commissions, though their recommendations are rarely acted upon, paradoxically, serve political ends. The "processing away" of violence, as Lupo characterizes the work of riot commissions, first and foremost is intended to address the fears of non-rioters, to show that elites are in control and that action is being taken. Although, the primary usefulness of riot commissions is to politicians, rather than to society as a whole, Lupo argues that riot commissions are not inherently inefficacious. Flak Catchers updates the literature on riot commissions, brings a sharply analytical perspective to the study of U.S. riot commissions, and addresses important new questions made possible by the excellent choice to study such commissions in a historical-comparative framework.
— Lorraine C. Minnite, Barnard College