Lexington Books
Pages: 224
•
Trim: 6 x 9
978-0-7391-3559-4 • Hardback • June 2011 • $128.00 • (£98.00)
978-0-7391-3560-0 • Paperback • May 2013 • $57.99 • (£45.00)
Alexander R. Thomas is associate professor of sociology at SUNY College at Oneonta. He is also the author of The Evolution of the Ancient City: Urban Theory and the Archaeology of the Fertile Crescent.
Brian Lowe is assistant professor of sociology at SUNY College at Oneonta.
Greg Fulkerson is assistant professor of sociology at SUNY College at Oneonta.
Polly Smith is assistant professor of sociology at Utica College.
Chapter 1: What is Rural?
Part 2 Part I: Structure
Chapter 3 Chapter 2: Rural Political Economy
Chapter 4 Chapter 3: Rural Space
Part 5 Part II: Space
Chapter 6 Chapter 4: Structuration in the Catskills
Chapter 7 Chapter 5: Space and Simulacra
Part 8 Part III: Culture
Chapter 9 Chapter 6: Rural Representations
Chapter 10 Chapter 7: Urbanormativity
Chapter 11 Chapter 8: Structure, Space, and Culture
Chapter 12 Appendix A: Catskill Urbanization Scale
Chapter 13 Appendix B: Comparing Downtowns
With regard to the discipline, the authors give a nice overview of the somewhat puzzling ‘retreat from the rural’ of mainstream sociology in the early 20th century and the resulting ‘urban bias.’ They focus somewhat less on the parallel development and divergences of ‘rural’ and ‘regular’ (urbancentric) sociology as quasi-independent fields, complete with separate scholarly organizations and intellectual orientations. Interestingly they also point to the recent retreat from the rural among departments formerly known as rural, now identified variously as some combination of ‘development,’ ‘community,’ or ‘environmental’ sociology. . . . I found much in the book to recommend. . . . I hope that this book will be of interest and use to a broad range of sociologists—and not only those who are already interested in the rural.
— American Journal of Sociology
Noting that cultural analyses of rural areas are lacking in the scholarly literature, the authors take as their primary task the investigation of culture in relation to political-economy and the organization of space. . . .[The book's] broad theoretical approach to analyzing the urban/rural divide in terms of the interaction of structure, space and culture is a welcome contribution to a general sociological literature that overlooks rural space and a rural sociological literature that often reifies and depoliticizes it by treating it as a categorical variable.
— Contemporary Sociology
The cultural, spatial, and structural mechanisms of urbanormativity illuminated in Critical Rural Theory represent a crucial contribution to rural sociology and broader social science disciplines. Incorporating contemporary theory, rigorous empirical methods, and cultural analyses at the community level, this volume provides a sobering—yet emancipatory—account of the marginal position of rural communities in the spatial hierarchy.
— Christopher J. Stapel, University of Kentucky
The literature on rural cultures in the United States has languished for years. This book takes a critical, cultural turn and provides a very strong argument for renewed attention to the rural areas of this country - its regional cultures and its social problems. Through the use of concrete examples from rural areas of New York State, the authors show readers that the sociological gaze should reach further than metropolitan hubs for interesting sociological analyses. By their example the authors urge us to look beyond the myths of our pastoral past to see the very real rural present and future.
— Karen E. Hayden, Merrimack College
Exceeding the boundaries of both rural and urban sociology, Critical Rural Theory: Structure, Space, Culture adapts critical theory and spatial analysis to render visible the rural peoples and cultures that feed us all and that so often shape our dreams of a peaceful past. Looking at how urban dependence on rural areas results in an urban cultural dominance, authors Alexander R. Thomas, Brian Lowe, Greg Fulkerson, and Polly Smith provide well-reasoned and varied perspectives for revaluing and re-evaluating the role of rural people and places in the global economy. Whether they are discussing real places or grand theories, the writers make an argument that will interest scholars and students of identity theory and cultural politics.
— Barbara Ching, Iowa State University