Lexington Books
Pages: 232
Trim: 6 x 9⅜
978-0-7391-1531-2 • Hardback • December 2006 • $117.00 • (£90.00)
978-0-7391-1532-9 • Paperback • December 2006 • $54.99 • (£42.00)
David E. Settje is assistant professor of history at Concordia University.
Chapter 1 Lutherans and the Cold and Vietnam Wars, 1964-1975: An Introduction
Chapter 2 Tortured for Christ: Lutheran Assessmetns of Global Communism
Chapter 3 Has the Tiger Changed Its Stripes? Lutheran Debates about Domestic Communism
Chapter 4 Lions Loose in the World: Pro-Vietnam War Lutherans
Chapter 5 The Mythology fo Prowling Communists: Lutheran Antiwar Sentiments
Chapter 6 Adrift on a Sea of Doubt: Lutheran Debates about Domestic Veitnam Concerns
Chapter 7 The Lutheran Cold and Vietnam Wars' Legacy
Highly Recommended.
— W. T. Lindley, Union University; Choice Reviews
[Settje's] approach and careful reading of sources are admirable. Lutherans and the Longest War is an excellent contribution to the genre of denominational studies and a useful starting point for exploring broader issues of religious assent, ambivalence, and dissent during the Cold War.
— H-Net: Humanities and Social Science Reviews Online, April 2008
The author does an admirable job in concisely summarizing the historical literature on both the origins of the American war in Vietnam and the landscape of American Lutheranism in the era, carefully distinguishing between the major Lutheran bodies without too much jargon. . . . [Settje] has a keen eye for especially catching phrases.
— Perry Bush; Journal of American History
David Settje provides a close examination of a period largely neglected by other Lutheran historians: the Cold War in general and the Vietnam War in particular.
—
Settje provides the first comprehensive look at Lutheran thinking on the Cold and Vietnam wars from pew to pulpit, and from editorial offices to denominational headquarters. It extends a microphone into a realm where the silent majority did not hold its tongue, exposing the wide-ranging views and vigorous debates that raged within church circles among those disinclined to march for either side.
— Jill Gill, Boise State University