Trim: 6¼ x 9¼
978-0-7391-8633-6 • Hardback • February 2014 • $114.00 • (£88.00)
978-0-7391-8634-3 • eBook • February 2014 • $102.50 • (£79.00)
Allen P. Mendenhall is adjunct professor at Faulkner University Thomas Goode Jones School of Law.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION:The Basis for Liberty
CHAPTER ONE:Emersonian Individualism
CHAPTER TWO:Liberty and Shakespeare
CHAPTER THREE:Law and Liberty in E.M. Forster’s A Passage to India
CHAPTER FOUR:A Tale of the Rise of Law: Geoffrey of Monmouth’s The History of the Kings of Britain
CHAPTER FIVE:Henry Hazlitt, Literary Critic
CHAPTER SIX:Bowdlerizing Huck
CHAPTER SEVEN:Literature, Transnational Law, and the Decline of the Nation-State
CONCLUSION:Towards a Libertarian Literary Theory
Countering an academic environment in which Marxism and its variants are still being fed to students, this volume of essays offers nutritious food for thought to scholars across the humanistic and social science disciplines—whether they are already conversant with libertarian literary criticism or have never heard of it.
— Libertarian Papers
The anti-capitalist and pro-socialist biases of many literary critics today are well-documented, but there are signs that the study of literature may be opening up to libertarian approaches. Allen Mendenhall represents a new generation of scholars whose exposure to Austrian economics has given them the intellectual tools they need to challenge Marxist, neo-Marxist, and quasi-Marxist analyses of literature. As both a student of literature and a practicing lawyer, Mendenhall brings genuine interdisciplinary training to the subjects he covers, several of which fall into the burgeoning field of law and literature. Eschewing the kind of jargon that infects many discussions of literature these days, Mendenhall writes clearly and effectively. Although this book has a polemical intent, and Mendenhall does not shy away from attacking well-known contemporary literary critics, he is not hostile to his intellectual opponents and actually tries to build bridges to the people against whom he is arguing.
— The Journal of Prices & Markets
Allen Mendenhall is both an attorney and an advanced student of literature. He also has an excellent knowledge of modern economics. . . .[A]s Mendenhall notes, non-Marxist treatments of economics and literature have been slow to develop. His new book, Literature and Liberty, goes far toward supplying this lack. It shows how much work can be done, and good work too, when law and literature are studied from the perspectives offered by a real competence in economic ideas. . . .Every part of the book shows the fully interdisciplinary character of Mendenhall's understanding of his subjects and his large knowledge of the historical periods he treats. Only the rare reader will be unable to learn from Mendenhall. . . .The kind of interdisciplinary work that Mendenhall advocates is an exciting enterprise, and one hopes that he will have much more to do with it.
— Quarterly Journal Of Austrian Economics
Allen Mendenhall presents libertarianism as an alternative lens through which to view works of literature as a means of understanding them better. . . .The economist Thomas Sowell has written that much of the academic work that calls itself ‘interdisciplinary’ is in fact non-disciplinary when it fails to require the actual mastery of multiple disciplines. Fortunately, Mendenhall’s work is not vulnerable to this critique. As the holder of both a Ph.D. in English (this book was published when he was a doctoral candidate) and a law degree, Mendenhall is well qualified to write on the intersection of literature, political theory, and law. . . .[H]is true interdisciplinary background allows him to critique literary studies from both the inside and the outside. . . .Literature and Liberty is a thought-provoking work that provides new looks at a number of classic texts from a perspective that is, quite frankly, refreshing given the current climate of literary criticism.
— Journal of Faith and the Academy
Freedom is all around us, but we sometimes need expert guides to help us see it. This is exactly what the brilliant Allen Mendenhall has done with his outstanding collection of essays on the way great literary fiction interacts with the themes of human liberty. In taking this approach, he is turning certain academic conventions on their heads, finding individualism and property rights where others look for social forces and collectivist imperatives. He helps us to have a rich and deeper appreciation of the libertarian tradition and its expanse beyond economics and politics.
— Jeffrey Tucker, CEO of Liberty.me
In Literature and Liberty, Allen Mendenhall aims to expand the marketplace of ideas in literary studies to include the entire spectrum of free-market theories. His goal is to break Marxism’s monopolistic hold over economic ideas in the study of imaginative literature. In his diverse chapters, he convincingly offers multiple transdisciplinary approaches to libertarian theory that literature scholars could adopt and build upon. Celebrating individualism and freedom in place of collectivism and determinism, Mendenhall focuses on commonalities and areas of agreement with respect to free-market theories. This approach increases the probability that the ideas in this ground-breaking volume will be widely embraced by thinkers from various schools of pro-capitalist thought, including, but not limited to Classical Liberalism, the Austrian School, the Judeo-Christian perspective, the Public Choice School, the Chicago School, the Human Flourishing School, and Objectivism.
— Edward W. Younkins
The much celebrated interdisciplinarity of contemporary criticism often amounts to nothing more than the absence of grounding in any traditional intellectual discipline, literary or otherwise. By contrast, Allen Mendenhall’s book is genuinely interdisciplinary. With solid credentials in law, economics, and literature, he moves seamlessly and productively among the fields. Covering a wide range of topics—from medieval history to postcolonial studies—Mendenhall opens up fresh perspectives on long-debated critical issues and raises new questions of his own.
— Paul A. Cantor, University of Virginia